Planning and Follow-up
More time for analysis, with entry based on familiar working practices.
Explore the solution →
From departments to fields, the work program brings company requirements into one view for review and follow-up.
Work programs often begin as departmental files sent to Planning, then change during reviews, meetings and approvals. Each update creates a need to verify the latest version, consolidate figures and review decisions.
| Challenge | Impact | PetroPlan approach |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple work program files | Unclear latest version | One project register |
| Different department templates | More coordination and review | Consistent entry fields and outputs |
| Manual budget consolidation | More Planning time | Consolidation by classification |
| Scattered approvals | Unclear project status | Recorded decisions and outstanding approvals |
| Changing project numbers | Difficult historical tracking | Numbering and rollover policies |
| Expenditure separate from budgets | Delayed comparison | Expenditure linked to projects |
| Repeated report preparation | Rework and inconsistent figures | Reports based on recorded data |
PetroPlan organizes work around the project: what needs to be delivered, its total cost and annual allocation, who reviewed it, which approvals remain, and how much expenditure has been recorded.
More time for analysis, with entry based on familiar working practices.
Explore the solution →A path to consolidated subsidiary oversight within an agreed enterprise scope.
Explore the solution →Shared information, independent owner decisions and oversight of allocations and recorded expenditure.
Explore the solution →Try entry, review, approvals and reports with a representative set of projects.